It cracks me up, irritates the heck out of me, and at times saddens me deeply. What behavior could possibly elicit all three responses? Actions taken or not taken by real estate investors based mostly upon one or more factors — some if not most of which were based upon pure subjectivity. The irritation often follows almost immediately when they claim their ‘analysis’ was the tipping point.
Gimme a break.
Various forms of analysis can be debated by reasonable people for sure. But subjectivity as the the driving force when you’re planning your retirement? What’s funny, or not as the case may be, is the way in which subjectivity, i.e. feelings of some sort, are used to rationalize doing what they were bound and determined to do regardless of anything objective or, forgive the word, analytical in nature.
I liken it to baseball — surprise surprise.
For years I was the guy who called every pitch for the teams I helped coach. If there’s anything requiring cold, clear thought, it’s pitch selection. For those not into baseball’s ins and outs, I’ll make it simple — pitching is one thing — the disruption of the hitter’s timing. The rest is important, but if a pitcher is consistently successful in messin’ with the hitters’ timing, he’ll win more than he loses.
This requires an objective and analytical approach by the pitcher. What’s the count? How has this particular hitter behaved in similar counts? Are there runners on base? Have I faced this guy before? And it goes on and on. Boiled down to its essence, if a batter is expecting a 92 mile an hour fastball and the pitcher throws a 78 mile an hour change-up, the odds favor the pitcher big time.
Some of the smartest pitchers in baseball are the ones who’ve relied solely upon the nastiness of their collection of pitches, but who’ve lost some gitty-up on their fastball. Now they hafta think. Greg Maddux might have been one of the smartest pitchers in baseball history. The last half of his career his so-called fastball couldn’t break glass. The average #1 starter for a AAA high school almost always throws as hard if not harder than Greg. Yet hitters in general just never could figure him out. When they knew a curve ball was coming on the outside corner, he’d throw a tailing fastball inside and break their bat.
The disruption of timing. Do that for 15-20 years, and like Greg, you’ll be a first ballot Hall of Famer for sure.
In real estate investing, the same holds true. How you feel about an investment is as relevant to your success as how a jet pilot ‘feels’ about gravity. Both the investor and the pilot will be far better off once they realize neither income property or gravity care how they feel.
The only concept, principle if you will, with which I’d like you to walk away, is this: Our feelings about investing, a wholly objective process if done correctly, will not be a causal factor in your success. On the other hand, they could very well be the direct cause of some very unwanted and unintended consequences.
Try bringing subjectivity into the equation after things have gone well. At that point you can brag about how you always had a good feeling about this or that property. Before the fact, subjectivity has no place in the real estate investment equation.
I’d feel really good if you’d call me.
619 889-7100. Have a good one.
Related posts:
- Tax Shelter — Real Estate Investors Should Beware the Professional Investor Trap
- The #1 Myth — Investing in Real Estate For Retirement — Boomers Beware
- A Classic Case Of Grandpa Economics Virus — Doomed Retirement
- Purposeful Planning For Real Estate Investors Must Be Flexible ‘Cuz Life Happens
- Some Questions For Real Estate Investors
IMO it isn’t so much about objectivity versus subjectivity as it is a case of being able to tell the two apart. Subjectively I prefer sfr, twoplex or at most fourplexes. Objectively I realize that may not be globally optimal. Just so long as I don’t delude myself about the difference I’ll be okay. And let’s face it, your idea of the appropriate size of a sominex account has a little bit of subjectivity in it. It has to in order to do its job.
Robert — Reality dictates subjectivity can’t be surgically eliminated, so I concede the point. That said, and using Sominex Accounts as an example, most clients and fellow investment brokers opine that my requirements are more conservative than the norm. And yes, that’s possibly their subjective thought too.
Your point about telling the difference between the two is excellent. I faced that choice myself as I took my company national back in late ’03. I didn’t want houses, period. However, when analysis consistently showed some markets to be golden for houses vs 2-4 units, I yielded to the numbers.
The smart person knows how to use objective analysis when trying to sway someone’s subjective opinion.
The wise person knows when to stop using objective analysis when trying to sway someone’s subjective opinion.
So true, so true.
Did I just encapsulate your entire career in two sentences?
Regardless, thanks for your making me always think about when, or if, to swing.
I think you just may have.