Short ‘n sweet tonight — or not, depending upon your outlook. I’m biased big time towards San Diego as an area for real estate investment capital. That said, there’s personal bias, and real life data. The facts are not kind to our local product, regardless of the opinion held by those who’ve lived here since the ’60′s or earlier as I have.
Investors look at the big picture, then drill down in order to come as close as possible to comparing apples and apples. Factors like location, income/price ratio, tenant quality, current and potential trends, property age, demographics, and many more play huge roles in the decision making process.
Does this describe your region? It’s a description of the vast majority of San Diego’s income property.
San Diego still sports small income properties (1-4 units) with prices reflecting price/rent ratios of 10-13 or worse. Strike 1.
Typically the age of these properties range from 20 on the low side (rare indeed), to over 50 years old. This just about guarantees future if not current functional obsolescence, significantly higher operating expenses, and/or all three ’till the investor bites the bullet, spending the boatload of capital it’ll take to provide the remedies. Strike 2.
Trends in San Diego since the mid-1980′s show a distinct preference for builders/developers putting up owner occupied housing, not duplexes/fourplexes or apartment complexes. The analysis is what drives their decisions, and regardless of the current downturn and impending recovery (don’t read anything definite in the word ‘impending’ please), I don’t see the numbers favoring a change in outlook any time soon. Strike 3.
The depreciable base of San Diego property is usually much lower than the competition in outa state regions. Why? Simple, a 40 year old property will make it difficult for the investor to claim a low percentage of land value to acquisition price. The higher percentage applied to the ‘improvement value’ of a property, the higher the annual tax shelter. Strike 4.
I could go on, but for to what end? This is why I’m willing to help local folks who simply can’t be talked out of their local bias, but insist they understand they’re buying what I rate as B-List product. It wasn’t very long ago that I wouldn’t even entertain the idea of being a party to San Diego property acquisition. As I said earlier, San Diego ain’t the Lone Ranger when it comes to these points. If your area meets some or all of the ‘downside factors’ mentioned above, you might wanna start treating that denial you’re harboring.
It’s down the road, when you’re ready to make the next move that the unsavory consequences of your current acquisitions will come home to roost. Sidestep those woes today by opting to overcome your biases for local B-List product. There’s plenty of A-List stuff to go around — really.
‘Nuff said.
Ready to get started — or to make your next move? Maybe you’re wondering if a move is even in your best interest at this point. Find out by talking with me. 619 889-7100 will find me every time just as an email will. Have a good one.
Related posts:
- San Diego Income Property Owners: Have Your Cake and Eat It Too
- San Diego Real Estate Investors — How’s That Income Property Workin’ For Ya So Far?
- Do You Own High Priced Income Property In San Diego? It’s Time To Let Go and Get Outa Dodge
- How Silly Is San Diego’s Income Property Market? You Decide
- San Diego Income Property Owners Will Never Have That Recipe Again
I can’t say enough about BG’s suggestion to buy newer property. We have both. The new properties we own have virtually NO maintenance.
The 1960′s apartments….6 years of nearly 50% expenses and allot of heartache.
Buy new!!!
The exception would be an older property that has been totally renovated to the ground, but where would one find something like that?
It IS possible to find superior management out of state with a little help from the BG tough interviewing and screening process.
If you ever decided to open a San Diego management firm, I’d send all my local clients to you without hesitation.